Posts

When is the best time to start planning for retirement?

/in /by

Planning for retirement is a bit like planting a tree, the best time to plant a tree (or start planning for retirement) was 20 years ago! The second-best time to start planting or planning is now.

When we think about retirement, from a financial perspective, we are often planning for a very long time. With an increasing life expectancy, the average Australian can expect to spend 20 to 30 years in retirement. In today’s society some people are looking to spend almost as much time in retirement as they spent working.

All too often we hear stories of people who are about to or have just retired and they visit a financial planner, often for the first time to get their retirement sorted. After all, super and the age pension is very confusing unless you have been closely involved with it for a long time.

Often when planners meet with prospective clients to discuss retirement, it becomes apparent that the retiree has insufficient savings, and particularly super, to support the type of lifestyle they have dreamed of.

What are some of the things I have learnt about planning for retirement, and would tell a “younger self”?

1. Don’t think you are too young to start planning for retirement. Time goes by very quickly and we find ourselves sitting on the threshold of retirement asking, “where did the years go?”

2. Aim to save 15% of income in a retirement savings account, from as early as possible. Employers are currently required to contribute 9.5% of a person’s salary to super. This is intended to increase to 12% over the coming years. However, by voluntarily contributing extra salary to super can mean the difference between a comfortable, and a very modest retirement. It can also be tax effective.

3. Eliminate debt as soon as possible. It is all too easy to get caught up in the trappings of everyday life and consumerism by wanting all the latest gadgets and toys. But the reality is, we often don’t need them and all we are doing is adding to our debt.

If we are to have the type of retirement we have always dreamed of, start planning as early as possible. Find a good financial planner who will work with you to help you set goals, develop smart savings strategies and invest wisely for a profitable future.

 

Peter Kelly | Centrepoint Alliance

Super contributions – Concessional & Non-Concessional

/in /by

Most people are aware there are two main types of superannuation contributions:
1. Non-concessional contributions, and
2. Concessional contributions

Non-concessional are personal contributions we make to super, for example; contributions we make for our spouse and for our children under 18 years of age.

These are contributions we do not intend to claim tax deductions for and are usually made from our after-tax income, from savings or from the proceeds from the sale of something such as an investment property.

There are a number of important rules around making non-concessional contributions, including:

  • The usual rules around age limits. That is, contributions may be made by someone under the age of 65. However, if aged between 65 and 75, a work test must be met in the year the contribution is being made. Non-concessional contributions can’t be made by people aged 75 or over.
  •  Non-concessional contributions are subject to an annual limit of $100,000 per year. However, where a person has a ‘total superannuation balance’ that exceeds $1.6m, they are no longer able to make non-concessional contributions. The total superannuation balance is the total of all amounts a person had in super at the end of the previous financial year.
  • A unique feature of non-concessional contributions is the ability to bring forward up to three years contributions, if under age 65. This means you may contribute up to $300,000 in one year, but then nothing in the next two financial years. The contributions that may be made under the three year bring forward rule are scaled back when your total superannuation balance exceeds $1.4m.

Concessional contributions are virtually any contributions that are not a non-concessional contribution. They include contributions made by an employer, tax-deductible personal contributions, and contributions made by third parties. Also, contributions made by a parent or grandparent for children aged 18 or older are treated as concessional contributions.

When concessional contributions are received by a super fund, they are treated as income of the fund and are taxable at a rate of 15%. This is often referred to as ‘contributions tax’.

Concessional contributions are subject to a maximum cap or annual limit of $25,000. This is a reduction in the limits that applied in 2016-17.
Exceeding either the concessional or non-concessional contribution cap can have tax implications, so this is best avoided.
If planning to make either non-concessional or concessional contributions before 30 June this year, consider seeking the assistance of a qualified financial planner.

Source: Peter Kelly | Centrepoint Alliance

Should we be able to access our super to buy a home?

/in /by
learn more
yeezy 350 boost

Is it a viable solution to grant early access to super to put towards purchasing a home?

The first thing we need to come to grips with is whether the access to super should be available irrespective of the number of houses people have owned, or whether it should be restricted to first home buyers. Secondly, just how much should we be able to withdraw – 20%, 50%, or all of our super savings?

The most recent version of the discussion talks about allowing a couple of years of compulsory superannuation contributions – the 9.5% superannuation guarantee contributions – to be diverted and used towards a home deposit. The information that I was looking at required an individual to match their superannuation contributions with personal savings on a dollar for dollar basis.

This would at least encourage people to make a concerted effort to save for their home rather than simply rely on their ability to withdraw amounts already in super.

Allowing access to superannuation savings, or providing other cash incentives including first home buyer grants, stamp duty concessions and the like, will simply mean that more money is available to chase the same number of properties. This means, when our first home buyer goes to an auction on Saturday morning, they will have another few thousand dollars more they can bid and so will the other bidders. The highest bidder will win the prize.

I don’t think that throwing more money at the problem is going to make housing any more affordable than it currently is. Perhaps, part of the solution is to seriously examine the supply side of the equation.

I am not necessarily suggesting we should be creating even more housing stock in our capital cities. An increasing focus on regional development, placing some restrictions on the sale of Australian properties to foreign investors, and changing the tax mix in relation to negative gearing and capital gains tax, might be ideas worth considering.

Source: Peter Kelly | Centrepoint Alliance