General Information about Financial Advice

Perspective: the way you see something

Over time your perspective can change. This is influenced by numerous factors including age, education, your varied life experiences, family, a circle of friends, and no doubt – travel.

I myself am a good example of changing my perspective over time. Especially if I recount my own personal experiences from the last couple of months.

I have just returned from holidays in France and Italy. Before I left on my holiday people were very kind in offering suggestions of what to see, what not to see, what to be careful of, who to be careful of, where to eat, and where to stay.

So before I had even left the country I was concerned about the attitude of the French, gypsies begging in the street, pickpockets, crowds and queues, my own security, terrorists, and the scorching heat of a European summer. My perspective had been altered and I asked myself, “have I made the right decision to go to France and Italy for my holidays?”

The tragedy that occurred in Nice just before I arrived did not help the situation.

After three weeks travelling through France and Italy, I can report that the people I met in France were very polite and helpful, I did see a number of people begging, but was never harassed by any. The crowds and queues can be significant but if you get up early the problem is reduced. It was warm but not unbearable, and security measures were visible in most places so I never felt overly concerned for my own safety.

My perspective had changed once again and was in a very positive mindset regarding my attitude to travel.

However, it did make me realise that the negative comments I had read or listened to prior to my holiday had altered my perspective, and made me question my decision to take holidays in France and Italy. I had, in fact, provoked my own degree of fear.

So my question now is with all the negative press regarding ‘longevity risk’ in retirement, do we run the risk of altering people’s perspective of retirement to one of fear and trepidation?

I do understand that longevity risk is a concern. But have we tipped the scales too far to the point where people are now over-concerned about spending too much money early in their retirement, and trying too hard to adjust spending patterns to ensure they are able to continue to fund their retirement when they do reach their late 80s?

There is no doubt a fine line that a person needs to tread between an appropriate level of spending and saving in retirement. After a recent meeting with older retirees in nursing homes (whose health now precludes them from doing much more than sitting and watching television), a common theme emerged – a regret of not doing a lot more when they were healthy and able.

Yes, I can hear you say ‘hindsight’ is a wonderful thing, and is a great foundation for making a decision but of course never a reality.

Now, I am certainly not saying that when people retire that they should go on a spending spree. But if a person’s perspective of retirement has been tainted by the looming negativity around ‘longevity risk’ and face retirement with a degree of fear and trepidation as an industry, have we now taken all the fun and anticipation out of a person’s pending retirement?

Retirement, as I have often stated, is a lot more than just ensuring a person has enough cash to fund their lifestyle. Let us make sure that when a person is planning their retirement that they do take a more holistic approach and consider their health, their objectives or goals, and their attitude – as well as their need for wealth. Let us make a person’s retirement a time to treasure which is full of memories, so when they are too old to do much more than sit and watch they do so without regrets.

Source: Mark Teale – Centrepoint Alliance

Is retirement a sustainable proposition?

Most Australians will be reliant on the government age pension to meet all, or a part, of their income needs for at least some of their retirement.

A small number of the population will remain self-funded retirees – for example; having no reliance on government funded income support (except for the Commonwealth Seniors Health Card).

However for the most part, at some stage in retirement, we will need to visit Centrelink and submit an application for the age pension.

The Australian age pension first became available to eligible folk once they turned 65 years of age – back in 1909. The Commonwealth age pension replaced pensions previously paid by the colonies (today known as our states and territories – before Federation).

However, the age pension is a relatively recent concept. It was in the mid-to-late 1800s that we started to see pensions introduced in parts of Europe by Otto von Bismarck, and for municipal employees (teachers, police, and firefighters), in the United States.

Like Australia – the American and European age pensions became payable to individuals once they reached a pre-determined age – generally between 65 and 70.

What was equally interesting was the fact that the average life expectancy at the time was around the same as the age of a person who would qualify for the age pension.

The governments back then worked on the theory they would only have to pay an age pension to those who survived until the qualifying age, and then it would only be payable for a relatively short period of time.

The Australian Bureau of Statistics estimated that in 2014 there were over 4,000 Australians aged 100 or older. This represented an increase of more than 260 per cent over the last two decades. In fact, today in Australia there are four living ‘super-centenarians’ (people who have lived up to, or over, 110!).

Even though we may not all live to be 100, Australians are living much longer than previous generations.

Today if someone passes away in their mid-to-late 70s it is seen as a tragedy that they died so young. Twenty years ago we would have said they lived a good and long life.

But what does a long life have to do with the age pension?

When the age pension was first introduced, it was designed to provide income in the final years of life when people were simply too old to work.

However today’s 65 year old is looking at 20 to 30 years of life ahead of them. Future governments simply will not be able to afford to pay an age pension to an increasing number of retirees who are living many years in retirement.

What might the future hold for retirement income and government support?

  1. Expect to see the qualifying age for the age pension increase over time. The age has already increased to 67 for people born after 31 December 1956. There have been suggestions, and even draft legislation supporting increasing the qualifying age to 70.
  2. Expect to use our own money first to support our retirement lifestyle and only then receive a government-funded age pension. Long gone are the days when we can amass large amounts of money in superannuation for the benefit of future generations.
  3. Don’t be surprised if the value of the family home is included when determining eligibility (assets) test for the age pension.
  4. We will all be working longer. Unless we have significant financial resources that enable us to fund our own retirement independently of the age pension, we will need to work longer.

If we desire a comfortable retirement that costs more than the age pension and our super may provide, some continued engagement in the workforce into our late 60s and even our early 70s may become a reality. Whether we remain an employee, or start our own business; and whether we work part-time or full-time; the options are endless.

Whatever we find ourselves doing – let’s make sure we enjoy it to the fullest.

 

Source:  Peter Kelly – Centrepoint Alliance

Are we working till we drop?

Many of us are coming to the realisation that our retirement dream is just that – a dream. Something that is elusive and perhaps not as attainable as we first thought it might be. We were looking at the world through rose-tinted glasses.

As a result – many of us may be confronted with having to modify our retirement plans. Rather than a luxury Winnebago in which to explore the great outdoors, we may have to ‘downsize’ our dream to a small caravan, a camper trailer, or even a two-person tent!

Perhaps, instead of our dream of a beach-front home – we may need to now look at smaller real estate, probably a street or two back from the beach, or even an apartment.

So how do we survive (and thrive) in an ever-changing world where the goal posts are constantly moving – sometimes due to changes in our own plans and circumstances, but often as a result of things which we have little, or no, control over. These include factors such as our health, the economy, changes to legislation and – even more frighteningly – the political instability of the world in which we live?

The answer lies in being adaptable. It means having the ability to change directions and travel down an altered path when life dictates a move in a different direction – or simply when we wake up one day and make the decision to travel via another fork in life’s road.

For many of us the realisation is that we may not be able to afford the type of retirement lifestyle we have always dreamt of.

So – what are the options?

If retirement is firmly on the agenda (through either choice or circumstance) the option may be to reframe our retirement objectives and pursue a more modest and affordable lifestyle.

However, for some, we may decide to continue to remain in the workforce a little longer than we may have intended – whether on a full-time, part-time, or casual basis. If we love what we do; continuing to work on a little longer may not be a difficult decision.

Of course; continued engagement in the work place delivers a number of benefits. Not only does it provide an opportunity to supplement, replace, or defer drawing down on our super and other savings – it provides an opportunity to remain engaged with other people, to deliver services to the broader community, and to pass on a lifetime of skills to the next generation.

However; there is a word of warning!

If remaining engaged in the workforce, whether it be part-time, full-time, casual, or even voluntary – we must ensure that we love what we do.

As is often said; if we love what we do we will never work a day in our life!

So – what are your plans for retirement? Does some form of continued workplace engagement beyond the ‘normal’ retirement date have a place in your plans?

 

Source:  Peter Kelly – Centrepoint Alliance

Loans and encumbrances; a pension minefield

For most people, being debt free in retirement is a priority. Others find the concept of ’good debt’ in retirement less stressful.

From an age/service pension perspective the correct structuring of good debt is important to ensure that any entitlement you may receive is not adversely affected.

When it comes to the Social Security Act – loans and encumbrances can be complicated and, in some cases, a little illogical. It is very important to understand that the taxation rules relating to debt are not necessarily the same as social security rules. For example; real estate investments can be considered.

So – let’s consider this real estate investment scenario:

An offer ‘too good to ignore’ comes your way and you decide to buy an investment unit down the road from where you live and rent it out. You then visit your bank (or your mortgage broker) to enquire about an investment loan.

The broker (or bank) are most impressed with you and decide that they will lend you the money to buy the unit. However; in addition to taking a mortgage out over the investment property they also need to secure the loan against your residential home as well.

From a taxation and a social security income perspective this is not an issue as (in both cases) the interest payable is deductible from the rent for the purposes of your tax and pension assessment.

However; there is one very important issue to consider. A person’s pension entitlement is also based on the value of their assets. The fact that the loan is secured against an exempt asset (family home), and an assessable asset means that the portion of the loan secured against the exempt asset (your home) is not used to reduce the asset value of the investment unit.

Care needs to be exercised here – as net rental income being received may not necessarily cover the reduction in a person’s pension in some circumstances.

When it comes to borrowing money to invest into shares or managed funds, the assessment side of things are slightly different.
The value of the asset shares, in this case, is reduced by the amount borrowed. For example – $50,000 is borrowed to purchase a parcel of shares valued at $100,000. Provided the loan secured against the shares – for the purposes of the assets test – the portfolio has a value of $50,000. The ‘hidden nasty’ here is that for the assessment under the income test, the whole value of the portfolio is viewed as a $100,000 share portfolio.
This is treated as a financial asset and it is this value that is subject to the relevant interest rates.

Unlike tax – the interest expense is not deducted from the income being deemed against the $100,000 portfolio.

“Oh…” I hear you say! And that is without even discussing the issues associated with loans to family trusts and companies, going guarantor, and associated loans.

When you are retired and receiving the Age Pension – borrowing and lending money (as well as going guarantor for loans taken out by your kids) can be a minefield with unwanted consequences.
So before you dive into the world of borrowing to invest – seek out the appropriate advice from an expert in the area.

 

Source: Mark Teale, Centrepoint Alliance

Investing for the long term

Getting your mental game right

One of the most influential figures of modern investment theory is Benjamin Graham. Among his numerous protégés is the most famous investor of all time, Warren Buffett. Benjamin Graham began his course at the Columbia Business School by saying “If you want to make money in Wall Street you must have the proper psychological attitude.” Or, as the equally famous baseball identity, Yogi Berra would say “90% of investment is half mental.

The basic insight here is that most investment success (or failure!) is driven by emotion, rather than faulty logic. Investors are seduced by the ‘greed and fear’ cycle to buy (or sell!) investments at precisely the wrong moment. Just as markets peak, they experience all the euphoria and leverage themselves to the maximum to buy investments at their most expensive. Then as markets decline, they become increasingly fearful, capitulating at the bottom of the cycle. Observers of the recent ‘Brexit’ vote in the UK would do well to recall this truth. It is important to separate well-founded negative sentiment, based on a rational analysis of developments in relevant markets, from mere fear triggered by the uncertainty of dynamic world events.

Pic1

 

By looking long term, you can see past the emotions of the moment and recognise the cycles as they occur. Instead of being a risk to your investment outcomes, the greed and fear cycle can begin to work in your favour. You then have the ability to follow the advice of Warren Buffett to “…be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful…


The power of compounding

The second advantage of taking a long term and patient approach to investment is that it allows you to unleash some seriously potent forces. Legend has it that Albert Einstein was once asked to nominate the most powerful force in the universe. He chose compound interest.

To see how this could be the case, consider the following scenario. Imagine you put aside $10,000 at the end of each year for your retirement. Imagine further that your investment is earning 7.21% p.a. (the average annual return of La Trobe Financial’s Pooled Mortgages Option since inception in October 2002).

Pic2

After year one, you would have your initial $10,000 investment. After year two, you would have $20,721, being your contributions of $20,000, plus interest of $721. After ten years, you would have $139,543, being your $100,000 of contributions, plus $39,543 of accumulated interest.

Here is where things get really interesting. As your principal sum grows, you earn interest on the larger amount. That means that the amount of interest you earn grows each year. In year two (after making your initial investment) you earn $721 in interest. After year ten, you are earning $10,061 in interest on top of your regular contribution of $10,000. But after year twenty you are earning $30,244 in interest and after year thirty you are earning a massive $70,734.45. What’s more, your principal amount at the end of year 30 is $981,060, despite your total contributions coming to just $300,000.

As you can see, the longer you’re in the game, the more compound interest works for you. That’s why getting rich slowly never goes out of fashion.


Long term investment

In the context of long term investment, it is worth noting that the ASX and Russell Investments have recently released the 2016 Long Term Investing Report. This report looks at some of the key asset classes and their performance over longer term horizons (generally 10 and 20 years).

Pic3

In this year’s report, the long term performance of the various asset classes were compared to a benchmark seen to be appropriate for a ‘reasonable’ balanced investor investing in a portfolio comprised of 70% growth and 30% defensive assets. This benchmark was set at a level of CPI plus 4% p.a. or an average of 6.6% p.a. over the 10 year period to end of December 2015.


What about SMSFs?

A new report challenges whether some SMSFs are delivering appropriate outcomes for investors. According to an article in the SMH, “Between 2010 and 2014, the bottom 10 per cent of SMSFs, those with balances of less than $100,000, have lost money every year since 2008, according to Australian Taxation Office figures. The ATO figures reveal that 44 per cent of SMSFs have on average not made a return over the past seven years.

So what can these investors do? It’s actually not that difficult. They need to review their investment strategy. This is where the three golden rules of investment could be useful. Pick those investments that you understand, diversify your holdings and take a patient, long-term approach.

 

Source:  La Trobe Financial