Posts

Sometimes it is more than just the money

This week I was asked about a person in their early 60s who has retired from the work force.

Briefly, they have roughly $500,000 in super and still have an outstanding mortgage of just over $300,000 on their home.

The question was – should they use their super to pay off their outstanding home loan or should they retain their home loan, with its modest interest rate so as to have the potential to earn a higher return on their super?

From a purely financial perspective, if the return on the invested funds is greater, after tax and charges, than the interest they are paying on their mortgage, then it’s better to retain the mortgage and use the money to generate investment returns, which can be used to service the debt. Provided the return on the investment over the longer term is greater than the interest on the loan, they will be ahead.

However, what if the person mentioned is stressed by the outstanding debt on their home, particularly as they have retired? After all, they still need to find the money to make their home loan repayments each month, and there is no guarantee that interest rates will remain where they are, or the return on their super will continue at its current rate.

If the debt is causing stress or anxiety, there is a strong argument to pay off the loan, even though they will no longer have the funds available for investment. In this situation, it is not so much a financial question, but rather, one that addresses the individual’s mental and physical health and well-being.

To fully provide appropriate advice that is truly in the best interests of the person asking the question, we need to go further.

We need to gain a clear understanding of a few things including, but not limited to:

1. What are the person’s assets and liabilities?
What do they own? What is it worth? How much do they owe others – in addition to their home loan do they have car loans, personal loans, and credit cards?

2. How much income do they need?
Do they have an up-to-date budget that identifies their current expenditure?

3. Where is their current income coming from?
Are they drawing down on their super, receiving government income support benefits such as Jobseeker or a disability support pension? Will they qualify for the age pension in the future, or do they have income from other sources such as trusts and other investments? Is their income likely to change in the future?

4. As this person lives in a major capital city their home is likely to be quite valuable.
Are they willing to consider accessing some of the equity in their home to generate additional income?
While they have the option of a reverse mortgage or other form of equity release product, a simpler approach may be to sell their home and downsize. However, people are often emotionally attached to their home and what may seem to be a reasonable and rational decision may not be all that easy to get across the line.

5. What are their longer-term goals?
What do they see a typical day in their retirement looking like?
Where will they live? How will they spend their time? What type of car will they drive? Where will they dine, and travel to?

6. How is their health?
Are they in good health or do they have ongoing health concerns that may impact on their longevity?

7. Do they plan to leave a legacy?
Are they happy to run down their savings over their retirement years or do they plan to preserve their capital so they can pass it on to future generations?

When planning for retirement, the financial aspects will play a key role. However, it is not just about the money.

Retirement planning is about living a life that is fulfilling and rewarding from a physical, mental, spiritual, and financial perspective.

Remember however, making financial decisions and planning for key life events such as retirement require time and careful consideration. With that in mind, seeking advice from an appropriately qualified financial planner is highly recommended.

 

Source: Peter Kelly | Centrepoint Alliance

Helping kids into the housing market

Home lenders have been tightening their lending criteria over recent years and many are now looking for home buyers to have a minimum deposit of 20% of the purchase price before they will approve a loan.

As housing prices have continued to spiral, the prospects of any young people having saved a 20% deposit is becoming increasingly difficult. After all, 20% of a $600,000 purchase is $120,000!

So, how can someone borrow for a home if they cannot manage to save their 20% deposit?

There seem to be a couple of solutions:

  1. Get Mum and Dad to lend or gift the shortfall

It is not uncommon these days for Mum and Dad to either lend the deposit to their kids or gift the money to them. Often this involves Mum and Dad withdrawing part of their super to give their kids a lift up into the housing market. Whether this is an appropriate strategy is very much dependent on individual personal circumstances and the capacity to help kids out.

  1. Mortgage Insurance

Where borrowers don’t have their 20% deposit saved, lenders will often require a borrower take out mortgage insurance.

  1. Personal Guarantee

We are seeing more and more Mums and Dads agreeing to provide a guarantee of all or part of their kid’s loans.

Providing a guarantee for your kid’s loan will often involve Mum and Dad providing some form of security for the guarantee. Generally, the kid’s home loan lender will take a mortgage on Mum and Dad’s home.

 

Source:  Peter Kelly | Centrepoint Alliance

Your Home – how attached are you?

I am going to look at home ownership from an older generational point of view.

For the majority of age pensioners, their home is the largest asset they own and in most situations the most expensive asset. The costs associated with owning a home are not minor, from council rates which can be quite high depending on where you live through to water rates, the ongoing maintenance and of course the yearly home insurance premium.

For a single age pensioner, with very little other income outside a full pension, these costs can prove quite high, but in all my years of talking to retirees, suggesting a person sell their home and downsize is normally met with a scowl and that this is not an option.
Why is it not an option?

For a large number of people, the house they currently live in has been their home for a lengthy period of time. It is where they have raised their children, it contains special memories or it could be the last place they lived with their spouse who has since passed away. Like their neighbours, they feel secure, they are comfortable with the task of travelling to their local shopping centre or their doctor is close by. Last but not least, if they have extra cash after selling their home and buying a smaller home would this affect their pension?

Accessing the equity in your home via a reverse mortgage could certainly be an option. But again the fear of making the bank your silent partner again, holding mortgage papers on your house can be a very daunting thought for an older single age pensioner.

Trying to educate and change a person’s mind and attitude who maybe in their eighties in relation to home ownership and the age pension is not easy. However, for a person in their fifties and sixties approaching their retirement, I believe this education and attitude change is a must, going into the future.

Source: Mark Teale | Centrepoint Alliance

Helping children buy a home while protecting parent’s interests

 

Gift-from-Mum-and-DadAs reported in the media at the end of January, Cate Blanchett and her husband recently bought a waterfront investment property for nearly $2 million, apparently as an investment for their three sons.

 

 

This is indicative of the trend of parents wanting to help their children get a start in life, particularly since the Australian property market is so hard to break into. The desire to help is further intensified if there are grandchildren on the way. A 2012 survey of Australians aged 50 and over revealed that parents give $22 billion a year to their adult children to help them get established, buy property and tide them over during tough times.” This is all well and good, but what are some of the issues that these benevolent parents should consider?

Gift, loan or other?

One way to help adult children buy a home is providing them with money to help with a deposit. The gift may be given directly or contributed to a First Home Saver Account, a tax-effective way to save for a home. The problem with gifting is that the money is not protected in the event your child is married or in a relationship, and your child and partner then separate or divorce. In the event of a relationship breakdown, the gift becomes part of the joint assets of the relationship. Another issue with gifting is where parents intend to receive the age pension within the next five years. Any asset or amount over or above $10,000 gifted by a single person or couple in a single financial year or above $30,000 over a five year rolling period impacts on parents’ pension entitlements for five years.

A better way to provide support and to protect parents’ interests is through a written loan agreement. Even though children may view this as an expression of distrust, a written agreement would give all parties certainty about what has been agreed and what is expected of everyone. It would show the family that they are serious about repaying the loan. A loan agreement would ensure that the parents’ rights are protected in the event a child’s relationship with his or her spouse or partner broke down. It would also be helpful in preventing sibling jealousy with respect to parents’ assets and future inheritances.

Another option is for parents to provide guarantor support for their children by providing either the parents’ home or term deposits as security. Financial institutions offer a variety of options. The Commonwealth Bank has a facility called Guarantor Support, which would enable a child – through parental support – to borrow more funds than they could otherwise or purchase the property that they want rather than having to settle for a cheaper alternative.

Finally, parents could consider buying the property jointly with their children, but this would mean the parents would have their names on the title deeds. For both guarantor support and joint ownership of property, parents need to be aware that they are fully liable for their child’s loan obligations.

As further protection, parents who gift or lend money can insist that their child and spouse or partner enter into a binding financial agreement to ensure that the gift or loan is repaid if the relationship fails. These agreements can be made either before or during a marriage or de facto relationship.

Parents should always obtain specialist legal and taxation advice when setting up a loan for their children.

That said, here are some options to consider:

•    Should the loan be on interest free or commercial terms? Generally speaking, the more commercial the terms of the loan, the more likely the courts will be to view the loan as neither an asset of a relationship between a child and spouse/partner nor a financial resource of the child. The child should make repayments of the loan principal or pay interest at least annually.

•     If interest is charged, will it be fixed or variable or pegged to a bank interest rate?

•     Should the loan be open ended or does it need to be repaid within a certain time frame?

•     Should parents request security over the debt, even through the agreement is classed as a personal debt?

On the last point, one practical form of security is a caveat over the property. A caveat simply provides notice that a person claims a particular unregistered interest in the property, but it is not as powerful as a mortgage, which creates official rights over the property. In a bankruptcy context, failing to take security over the child’s assets may mean that other creditors get paid before the parent.

The importance of life insurance

Regardless of the way parents decide to financially help their children purchase a home, life insurance on the lives of children and even their partners should be considered. If illness, injury, or even death were to happen to an adult child who had just purchased home, it would be quite likely that the child – even one with a spouse or partner – would have trouble meeting mortgage repayments and could possibly even lose the home. The consequences would be compounded by the fact that the parents have provided funding, one way or another, with a potential impact on their retirement plans.

However, given that the child has just spent all his or her savings on the home purchase and associated costs, life insurance affordability would be an issue. Given this minimal cash flow, parents can also assist in this area, particularly as this would protect both themselves and their children. With lump sum covers (term life, TPD and trauma cover), the easiest way to do this is to set up a non-super (ordinary) life policy owned by the parents on the life of the child. This ownership structure would satisfy CGT exemptions under section 118-300 ITAA97 for term life (as the parents would be the original beneficial owners of the policy) and section 118-37 ITAA97 for TPD and trauma. These exemptions would also apply for cover over the life of the child’s spouse or de facto partner, so all lump-sum insurance proceeds would be tax free to the parents.

The good news is that given the age of the children, insurance premiums should be relatively low. The level of cover should at least be the amount of the loan or gift, so that the parents would not have a shortfall if an insurable event occurs. Income protection for the child should also be considered. This must be owned by the child to ensure that a tax deduction can be claimed, but of course the parents could also help out financially. Once the loan is repaid, the parents have the option of transferring the insurance cover to their adult children, so they could assume premium payments.

Summary

Most parents naturally want to help their children get started in life, and often provide a gift or a loan to help with a home deposit. The benefit of a properly documented loan is that it protects family finances in the event of an adult child’s relationship breakdown.

Life insurance on the adult children should be considered in order to protect the asset and parental financial support. The initial premiums can be paid by the parents and are relatively affordable given the age of the lives insured.

Source:  CommInsure

 

To pay or not to pay, that is the mortgage question

 

mortgage-credit-loan-signHome ownership is the Australian dream, but we also have a lot of other big dreams… overseas holidays, buying a boat or sending the kids to a great private school. So how do you decide whether you should pay off your mortgage faster or invest it for your big dreams?

The debate on paying off your mortgage versus investing can seem never-ending and everyone has an opinion. When it comes down to it, the right course of action depends on your personal situation, risk profile and financial goals.

One way to evaluate the situation is to think mathematically– you can compare the tax implications, interest savings, rates of return and past market movements.

This sort of evaluation can be complicated, so it might be best to get your financial adviser involved to help with the quantitative analysis. Before you do that, you can ask yourself a few questions to start the decision making process.

How many years do you have left on your mortgage?

If you have less than 10 years left on your mortgage, you might want to consider paying it off, as 10 years may represent a short period to invest in the stock market or investment bonds.

How good are you at sticking to a plan?

Paying off your mortgage early may present you with a surplus of cash or disposable income. If you are not disciplined and stick to your investment plan, you may find yourself tempted to spend your surplus funds. This can set you up in a fantastic lifestyle, but it may not be sustainable through your retirement if you don’t save enough.

Is your lifestyle stable?

You know your personal situation best and you can decide how stable the future is likely to be or if there is a high probability that something will come along and derail your financial plans. If you feel secure in your job and that you won’t need to access a lot of cash quickly, then aggressively reducing the mortgage might be the best path for you.

If you are the sole bread winner or job security is an issue, you might look at investing so that you can access your money in case of emergency or leaving the surplus within a redraw facility.

If your mortgage does not have a redraw facility and you pay it off aggressively, you could run the risk of needing to borrow money later at a higher interest rate.

What are your investment goals?

If you need to invest for an important goal, you need to look at how much money you will need for that goal and how far off it is. If your goals are a long way off, you can have the satisfaction of both investing and making additional payments on your mortgage. It is as simple as allocating part of your available surplus funds for one goal and then using the remainder towards reducing your mortgage.

 

So, what should you do?

You need to look at both the mathematical and emotional parts of your financial strategy. Your financial adviser will help you weigh the pros and cons of different investments and can provide a financial analysis for each option.

Case study

Judith has a home loan of $250,000 with 20 years left to pay.

She is paying $1,908.35 per month of principal and interest and has an extra $100 a month to play with. She is considering the following options:

Option

Implication after 20 years

Use the $100 to pay off her mortgage, after she has paid off the mortgage after the 18th year, she will have $2,008.35 a month in cash which she will invest

Judith will have $51,780 in her investment

Invest the $100 into an investment bond

Judith will have $43,888 in her investment

Invest the $100 as a contribution to super after tax

Judith will have an additional $46,655 in her super

Salary sacrifice the amount as $194.17 before tax

Judith will have an additional $77,001 in her super

Things Judith will need to consider:

  • The best option is for Judith to put her extra money into super via pre-tax salary sacrifice payments, however these contributions are preserved (locked away) until retirement and Judith may need to access this money before she retires.
  • If she pays off her mortgage, she will then need to look at her ability to redraw the money if she needs to access funds in the case of an emergency.
  • If she invests into the share market, she will have to pay tax on the investment earnings and capital gains upon sale of the investments.
  • If she pays the $100 into an investment bond, the investment earnings (including capital gains) will be taxed at a maximum rate of 30%. Withdrawing from the bond after 10 years from the initial investment means there will be no taxation implications.
  • The calculations in this case study are based on the following; the mortgage has 6.8% interest rate, her super fund, investment bond and investment portfolio returned 6.5% (inclusive of 3% pa growth, net of fees and excluding franking credits). Tax on earnings has been factored into all options (including the super fund and investment bond) whilst she paying 45% tax (not including the Flood Levy) on the investment portfolio. But these could change in the future.

Contact your adviser today to discuss the best options for you.

Source | IOOF