Posts

Helping kids into the housing market

Home lenders have been tightening their lending criteria over recent years and many are now looking for home buyers to have a minimum deposit of 20% of the purchase price before they will approve a loan.

As housing prices have continued to spiral, the prospects of any young people having saved a 20% deposit is becoming increasingly difficult. After all, 20% of a $600,000 purchase is $120,000!

So, how can someone borrow for a home if they cannot manage to save their 20% deposit?

There seem to be a couple of solutions:

  1. Get Mum and Dad to lend or gift the shortfall

It is not uncommon these days for Mum and Dad to either lend the deposit to their kids or gift the money to them. Often this involves Mum and Dad withdrawing part of their super to give their kids a lift up into the housing market. Whether this is an appropriate strategy is very much dependent on individual personal circumstances and the capacity to help kids out.

  1. Mortgage Insurance

Where borrowers don’t have their 20% deposit saved, lenders will often require a borrower take out mortgage insurance.

  1. Personal Guarantee

We are seeing more and more Mums and Dads agreeing to provide a guarantee of all or part of their kid’s loans.

Providing a guarantee for your kid’s loan will often involve Mum and Dad providing some form of security for the guarantee. Generally, the kid’s home loan lender will take a mortgage on Mum and Dad’s home.

 

Source:  Peter Kelly | Centrepoint Alliance

Affordable housing – Is super the answer?

In the 2017 Budget, the Government announced several measures designed to ease the pressure on spiralling housing prices, particularly in the East Coast capital cities of Melbourne, Sydney and to a lesser degree, Brisbane.

I will provide an update on two of the key measures contained in the 2017 Budget.

On 7 September, the Government tabled a Bill in the House of Representatives covering its first two measures.

  1. The First Home Savers Super Scheme (FHSSS)

This initiative is designed to allow intending first home buyers to save for their home deposit through superannuation and then withdraw the savings when the time comes to buy.

A broad outline of the scheme will allow additional contributions of up to $15,000 to be made each year with the maximum amount that may be withdrawn being $30,000 plus investment earnings. For a couple, multiply this by two.

Contributions may be concessional contributions, such as those made under a salary sacrifice arrangement or personal contributions where a tax deduction has been claimed. Or, they may be non-concessional contributions made from after-tax income. All contributions made under the scheme are subject to the usual contribution caps.

Contributions made by an employer in fulfilling their superannuation guarantee obligations – the 9.5% contribution – cannot be withdrawn under the scheme. Only voluntary contributions may be withdrawn.

The FHSSS came into effect on 1 July 2017, however, at the time of writing, the legislation has not been passed by the Parliament.

With that is mind, it might be prudent to wait until there is legislative certainty before making additional voluntary contributions that may be required for a home deposit.

Whether the FHSSS is an appropriate strategy will be very much dependent on individual circumstances. Some appropriate advice, before putting extra money into super, is vitally important.

  1. Downsizer Contributions

In an attempt to free up housing that is currently occupied by older Australians, the Government has introduced legislation that will enable people aged 65 and over, who have owned their home for at least 10 years, to contribute up to $300,000 of the sale proceeds of their home to superannuation as a non-concessional contribution.

These contributions will not be subject to the usual restrictions that apply to making non-concessional contributions.

Once legislated, this initiative is due to come into effect from 1 July 2018. It will only apply to home sales occurring on or after that date.

Whether this measure will make a meaningful difference to the supply of housing is questionable.

One of my biggest concerns is that the primary residence is currently exempt from the assets and income tests for the age and Veterans Affairs pensions. With a very high proportion of older Australians receiving either a part or a full pension, the implications of downsizing could be significant.

Selling the family home and investing any surplus proceeds from the sale into superannuation, or most other types of investment will see money that was previously exempt from means testing now being caught under the assets and income test.

In fact, a couple of modest means who own a valuable home could lose their age pension entirely if they sold their family home and contributed $300,000 each to superannuation as a non-concessional contribution.

However, contributing the surplus proceeds from the sale of a family home, to super will be quite appropriate for some.

Like so many of these initiatives that at first glance seem very attractive, the devil lies in the detail. Whether selling the family home and downsizing simply to get more money into super is an appropriate strategy, will depend on individual circumstances.

 

Source:  Peter Kelly | Centrepoint Alliance

Should we be able to access our super to buy a home?

Is it a viable solution to grant early access to super to put towards purchasing a home?

The first thing we need to come to grips with is whether the access to super should be available irrespective of the number of houses people have owned, or whether it should be restricted to first home buyers. Secondly, just how much should we be able to withdraw – 20%, 50%, or all of our super savings?

The most recent version of the discussion talks about allowing a couple of years of compulsory superannuation contributions – the 9.5% superannuation guarantee contributions – to be diverted and used towards a home deposit. The information that I was looking at required an individual to match their superannuation contributions with personal savings on a dollar for dollar basis.

This would at least encourage people to make a concerted effort to save for their home rather than simply rely on their ability to withdraw amounts already in super.

Allowing access to superannuation savings, or providing other cash incentives including first home buyer grants, stamp duty concessions and the like, will simply mean that more money is available to chase the same number of properties. This means, when our first home buyer goes to an auction on Saturday morning, they will have another few thousand dollars more they can bid and so will the other bidders. The highest bidder will win the prize.

I don’t think that throwing more money at the problem is going to make housing any more affordable than it currently is. Perhaps, part of the solution is to seriously examine the supply side of the equation.

I am not necessarily suggesting we should be creating even more housing stock in our capital cities. An increasing focus on regional development, placing some restrictions on the sale of Australian properties to foreign investors, and changing the tax mix in relation to negative gearing and capital gains tax, might be ideas worth considering.

Source: Peter Kelly | Centrepoint Alliance

Total returns show why housing investment remains so popular

Despite the recent slowdown, housing finance data highlights that investor activity in the housing market is starting to rise again and when you look at total returns from housing it’s no surprise.

The CoreLogic RP Data Accumulation Index has been published since June 2009 and highlights the total returns from residential property.  The total returns include both the increase in values as well as gross rental returns.

The first chart below shows the annual change in the total returns (accumulation) index over time.  While combined capital city home values recorded longer and deeper falls during 2011-2012, total returns were negative for only a short period of time thanks to the uplift from rental yields.  More recently you can see that the annual change in total returns across the combined capital cities has remained quite strong.

Combined capital city annual changes in total returns for houses and units

Housing 1

In the below chart it shows over the 12 months to May 2016, combined capital city home values have increased by 10.0% while total returns have been recorded at a higher 13.9%.  Looking at the individual capital cities, all cities except for Perth have recorded positive total returns over the past year.  Sydney and Melbourne which have been the most active investment markets have seen the highest total returns at 16.9% and 17.5% respectively over the past twelve months.  It should be noted that gross rental returns in both of these cities are now at record lows highlighting that the majority of these returns have come via an increase in home values.

Annual change in capital city total returns, 12 months to May 2016

Housing 2

The third chart below highlights the total returns over the past five years across all capital cities.  Again, Sydney in particular, has seen far superior total returns compared to all other capital cities.  Melbourne has also experienced relatively strong total returns over the past five years.  Again this highlights why these two cities in particular have remained so popular with investors.  In all other capital cities returns from residential property have been positive.  In many of these cities the total returns have been driven more so by the rental returns rather than the capital growth which has been the key driver in Sydney and Melbourne.

5 year total change in total returns, to May 2016

Housing 3

Despite the recent rebound in value growth, the mature capital growth cycle and record low rental returns in Sydney and Melbourne, total returns are unlikely to be as strong in these cities over the coming years.  A more balanced investment approach which focuses on moderate capital growth and relatively strong rental returns is likely to be a superior housing investment profile over the coming years.  This data also highlights why housing investment has been so popular.  In a low interest rate and subsequently low return environment housing has, over recent years, offered attractive returns.  Whether this continues to be the case remains to be seen.

 

Source:  Cameron Kusher – CoreLogic RP Data

AFD Financial Solutions can help you with all your home loan needs for either owner occupied or investment property. Give us a call today on (08) 8132 2655.